2015 Jaguar F-Type Coupe R vs. 2014 Porsche 911 50th Anniversary Edition – Head 2 Head Ep. 55

Porsche 911 50th Anniversary Edition Review

2015 Jaguar F-Type Coupe R vs. 2014 Porsche 911 50th Anniversary Edition – Head 2 Head Ep. 55

On this episode of Head 2 Head, two of the best driver’s cars on the market face off. The 550-horsepower Jaguar F-Type Coupe R and 430-horsepower Porsche 911…
Porsche 911 50th anniversary edition review Video Rating: 4 / 5

Porsche 911 50th anniversary edition review is listed in the Porsche Category.

Originally posted 2014-07-22 22:09:41. Republished by Blog Post Promoter


  1. Bruno Celso says:

    #Jaguar *F-Type Coupe R – 2015* vs #Porsche *911 – 2014*

  2. MarksmanGamingVideos says:

    I am so confused because of those 0-60 times. They say the Jag reaches 60
    in 3.6s whereas jaguar states 4.2s. It’s a similar thing with nearly every
    car they test. And it’s really frustrating to never get a response by
    anyone from Motor Trend about this topic.

  3. PantherP74 says:

    I’m sorry, but I’m not spending $150k on something people don’t even look
    twice at anymore on the road.

    The Jag looks better, sounds better, and is faster overall in most
    situations one would find themselves in on the street.

    I’ll enjoy the $30k I save.

  4. senorgato70 says:

    The Jag is one gorgeous car and a relative performance bargain. But The
    500lb difference and an average interior are some negatives. The Jag
    weighs as much as an Audi S5 (4.2), without a back seat, quattro AWD, trunk
    space, and 6 inches shorter. The only negative on the Porsche is its price
    and, to a lesser degree, its relatively modest power comparatively

  5. Porsche 919 Hybrid says:

    You know the engineers did a wonderful job when every ignorant person
    claims that Porsche pays journalists for reviews. 

  6. Parker Barandon says:

    next: mclaren p1 vs porsche 918 spyder, please!!!!!!

  7. Easy win for the almighty 911. The car is so much better and looks better
    too. The Jag looks is not bad, but it is a bit too much. 911 has an
    understated elegance about it. Appreciated by us with taste. (That’s
    usually us Europeans)

    I don’t like cars. I like Porsches. The rest? Take the junk to the
    recycling center. Perhaps a few Ferrari models can compete.
    I believe we Porsche guys are the weirdest and the most loyal. Take the
    Porsche aficionados in California. Magnus Walker, the Singer guys and
    Sharkworks. No other car marque has such a following.

  8. bmwmsport11 says:

    I have yet to see a F-Type in person. Does it compete with the cars like
    the SL-Class or cars like the Z4? or is it something in between? It looks
    small like a Z4 but is priced like a SL550. More power than a Cayman but
    not as much as a M6. Im confused on where the F-Type stands in the market.

  9. navinya ambre says:

    Nope, it’s indian Corvette :-) 

  10. gamerguy348 says:

    I’d pick the Porsche even without the MT bias, because I feel the F-Type is
    just way too overhyped for a car that looks somewhat average and has a way
    too obnoxious exhaust.

  11. egon olzen says:

    The only reason you can compare these cars is because there’s germans
    managing Jaguar. If it was british you would have a horse or a cow in front
    of the it.

    In fact the name it’s such an insult to one of the most beautiful preditors
    of the world. The Jaguar

  12. 9:58 minute mark “driving either one will make you gay” ?? Did I hear that

  13. I still don’t know how an all aluminum small sports car with 2 seats
    manages to be 1680kg. And heavier than a 4 seat
    steel/ aluminum car. What does English Aluminum contain?

  14. AlexRmF says:

    I’m still waiting for the day when a Porsche will lose a Head2Head…
    MotorTrend people sure like that builder and I don’t really agree. it’s
    almost like valuing soft-skills more than visible/hard skills in a person

  15. jamesgjt says:

    Reason why porches win: because it has 2 more seats

  16. BubbaSmurft says:

    HolleyHell, the Jag’s 30″ wider? DANG that’s a big butt.

  17. FIFAracer says:

    Fun fact, the Turbo s with the same hp, gets from 0-60 in 2,6 seconds.

  18. Snakebloke says:

    “…length and heighth…” HEIGHTH!?! Stop bastardising the English
    language please… it’s length and HEIGHT

  19. JeremyLoveTech123 says:

    Idk but I feel like they always exaggerate the acceleration timing. It is
    almost IMPOSSIBLE to launch the F-Type under 3.8 secs and 7times out of
    10times you’ll get massive wheel spin if u dont get it right. 3.6? nah,
    more like 4-4.3

  20. Damien Parker says:

    Yeah i disagree with this guy, Based on the $44,000 price difference, the
    exhaust sound, and the HUGE horse power difference, i would have to say the
    Jag wins. Thats a little thing called logic……..